Print Story Monday morning news round up and the life and times of lm over the weekend
Diary
By lm (Mon May 12, 2008 at 10:30:44 AM EST) (all tags)
Nothing terribly exciting here to see. Please move along.


When it comes to economic issues, I think the real indicators are trends like the the uptick in gray market goods:
Amish-run salvage stores, a thriving discount industry tucked away in America's farmlands, sell expired food and medicine dirt-cheap. This shadow economy, run by people who typically shun modern methods of commerce, is drawing a steady stream of non-Amish customers seeking relief from the country's financial ills.
. I found this article especially interesting because it told me something that I did not know. Except for baby formula, the Food and Drug Administration doesn't prohibit sale of expired foods or medicines.. How about them apples? Not selling food past the expiration date is a self-imposed behavior by retailers in the US.

Elsewhere in Ohio news, a A young turk is taking on house minority leader Boehner. Thus far this soon-to-be graduate of a local college has raised 13k to Boehner's two and half million. There's some interesting commentary in there about how the Democratic party generally doesn't support those without good odds. Stein is having large donors in Boehner's district cherry-picked by people running in other districts with better odds.

George Soros makes a bit of sense that tends to get overlooked by Randroids, Libertarians and Will Wilkinson. Speaking of deregulation Soros said: 

The idea was that regulators always make mistakes, state interference in the markets just messes things up. And that was a false idea .... Regulators are human and bound to make mistakes, but markets are also human and they are also bound to make mistakes.

NPR also had a funny piece on the political put down.

I can't find a link, but I also heard a bit of a speech Clinton gave to some audience predominantly filled with woman in which she thanked them for being the backbone of her campaign responsible for wins in virtually every primary contest. It's been a while since I heard such an openly sexist appeal in US politics. She isn't even trying to code it like she does her race baiting.

Late on Friday, I found out that one of my closest friends had been admitted to a hospital earlier in the week on death's door. The last report I've suggests that he's beginning to recover but they've found a very serious problem, an unidentified mass on his heart. If it's an infection, the same course of strong anti-biotics that seems to have helped thus far should eventually take care of the problem. On the other hand it could also be a tumor. Or even worse, he could be carrying around a parasitic alien embryo.

Saturday was the usual day of housework, yardwork and studying. Saturday night a few people came over after Vespers and we shared of my favorite oh, so wrong recipes Beef Stroganoff Coca-Cola. After arguing far too late into the night over how early `persons' was used as the plural for `person' rather than `people', I ended up getting some sleep.

On Sunday, plans to get a posse together to make the two hour drive to visit my friend in the hospital fizzled. I couldn't get hold of him by telephone and, not knowing whether or not he was really up for visitors, didn't want to make the trip down. Perhaps, if visiting hours extend late enough, we can make the trip after dinner this week.

Sunday morning was exceedingly fun. My youngest daughter and I walked to Church in the rain. Both of us were soaked from the waist down by the time we covered the half mile from home to Church. It was warm enough out to not be uncomfortable and we sloshed around in the puddles, mostly by accident, a bit.

Also last week, I got good news and bad news on the grad school front. I'm out of the running for a stipend at the one school I was accepted by. But I'm `positioned well' to receive tuition remission. I'm not exactly holding my breath, but after considering all my options and talking with my wife, I think tuition expenses being covered alone will be sufficient. I'm also still on the waiting list for one other school that doesn't accept candidates at all unless they can provide full funding but I'm not very optimistic about hearing further on that.

I clocked in on the scale at 185, same as last weekend and the weekend before that. On Good Friday, I was down to 179. By Bright Monday I was back up to 185.

< What kind of music do Austrians like? | Let's catch up. >
Monday morning news round up and the life and times of lm over the weekend | 19 comments (19 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
Cooking with coca-cola by wiredog (2.00 / 0) #1 Mon May 12, 2008 at 10:46:46 AM EST
Not sure what's wrong with that. Coke has a quite a few spices in it that are also used in stewing. The color enhances the stew colors. The sugar is counteracted by the sour cream.

Stews can also be made with large amounts of wine (beef bourguignon) or beer (beef carbonnade (use a good dark ber, but not a stout)).

Have you talked to your friend about the parasitic alien embryo possibility?

Not selling food past the expiration date is a self-imposed behavior by retailers in the US.
I would argue that it is self-imposed to the extent that most consumers won't buy it. OTOH, the local grocery stores here in NoVa, hardly hotbeds of cost-consciousness, have sections where various past-their-expiration-dates foods are sold at half price.

Earth First!
(We can strip mine the rest later.)



Careful when you visit your friend by sasquatchan (2.00 / 0) #2 Mon May 12, 2008 at 10:51:40 AM EST
make sure he doesn't eat anything while you're there..
Stand Back



Clinton's race baiting by MillMan (2.00 / 0) #3 Mon May 12, 2008 at 02:43:42 PM EST
Last week she barely bothered to code it with her "I'm more appealing to whites" talk.

When I'm imprisoned as an enemy combatant, will you blog about it?


Would you prefer it coded? by Billy Goat (4.00 / 2) #4 Mon May 12, 2008 at 03:01:13 PM EST
Like in the Obama ad where, over the strains of "Sing Low Sweet Chariot," Jesse Jackson Jr. says "A lot of politicians call themselves our friends. But Obama has a heart that beats for our community. And he’s dedicated his life to the struggle."

If you're going to play the race card, why not just do it openly and get it over with? This proxy stuff is for cowards.

[ Parent ]

You think that's baiting? by lm (2.00 / 0) #5 Mon May 12, 2008 at 03:19:39 PM EST
I think there's a substantial difference between the statement 'Candidate X is good for Community Y' and `Community Y votes for Candidate X because Candidate X is a Z' or `Only Candidate X can get votes from Community Y.'

Feel free to differ.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

You think that's quoting? by Billy Goat (2.00 / 0) #6 Mon May 12, 2008 at 03:31:18 PM EST
Nobody said only Candidate X could get votes from community Y. Clinton said that the white, work class, non-college voters support her strongly. That's a crucial constituency for creating national Dem coalition.

This is like the "gotcha" crap Obama faced after the "bitter" comment. He said something true, if he worded it poorly, and everybody tried to turn it into some vast generalization that proved he's an elitist. Now Clinton points out that she's doing better in a demographic Democrats badly need and suddenly she's a race baiting Klan-member.

I will retract my statement if you can find Clinton saying that white working class people will only vote for a white person. As she's already admitted that she thinks Obama could beat McCain (Pennsylvania debate), I think you'll have a hard time finding your smoking gun.

[ Parent ]

Like I said, feel free to differ by lm (2.00 / 0) #7 Mon May 12, 2008 at 04:08:13 PM EST
Clinton's words were ``Senator Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again.''

I don't think it's doing any injustice to her words. I don't think that's taking them out of context. I don't think that is playing `gotcha.' In context, the plain sense of her words is that she thinks that Obama is weak at winning the votes of white folk. This is the same line that's been coming from Ickes, Feraro, Clinton's spouse and other Clinton surrogates.

Further, I think this is different in kind than the commercial you quoted from which speaks to being a long standing supporter of a given community.

Feel free to differ.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

You feel that her quote . . . by Billy Goat (2.00 / 0) #8 Mon May 12, 2008 at 04:47:00 PM EST
"Senator Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again."

Is the same as saying . . .

"Only candidate Clinton can get votes from white folks."

Because the wording looks pretty different to me. The first, when she said it, was true. The second, when I wrote it, was something I had to make up because nobody has ever said it.

Further, you're fooling yourself if you can't see that the reference to Obama's race is implicit in the contrast between "politicians who call themselves our friends" and somebody who has a "heart that beats for our community." That's not a reference of support; that's a reference of membership.

If Clinton said she could deliver the female vote, you'd poop kittens over her naked sexism. Obama tells the Associated Press that "I guarantee you African-American turnout, if I'm the nominee, goes up 30 percent around the country - minimum" (1/20/08) and you don't bat an eye.

I should add that this isn't some random surrogate who said these things either. The ad, as all of Obama's ads are, is capped with a helpful reminder that he, Obama, supports this message. The ad comes from his camp and he signed off on it. The quote about delivering the black vote is from the man himself.

I look forward to your denunciation of Obama's naked racist campaign tactics.

[ Parent ]

That should read "nakedly racist." by Billy Goat (2.00 / 0) #9 Mon May 12, 2008 at 04:53:12 PM EST
I don't think you should denounce his naked campaign tactics. I think you can all agree that his naked campaign tactics should bring the lady vote running.

[ Parent ]

Fooling myself by lm (2.00 / 0) #14 Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:10:22 AM EST
me: this is my reading, I think reasonable people can disagree.

you: you're deluded at best, deceiving at worst.

I think it clear which of us is deluding himself.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

I think reasonable people can disagree. by Billy Goat (2.00 / 0) #15 Tue May 13, 2008 at 11:23:43 AM EST
But I also think reasonable people can sometimes run into delusional people who refuse to see that the standards they're holding their own candidate too are significantly lower than the standards they apply to other candidates, especially when it comes to race and gender politics.

The last time you attacked Clinton, you demanded proof that Obama misrepresented her plan. I gave you an ad Obama approved that took criticism of McCain's plan and passed it off as valid criticism of Clinton's plan.

You failed to respond.

Now you claim Clinton is disgusting in her appeals to identity politics.

I've presented you with two appeals by Obama to the sort of identity politics that you find so objectionable when Clinton does them.

You've denied that the first instance is an example (though you seem to be alone on this), but you don't mention Obama's explicit claim to be able to deliver the black vote for Dems.

Again, you've failed to show why Obama's behavior is acceptable, but Clinton's is beyond the pale.

Reasonable people can disagree. But that's not what's happening here. You're ignoring facts, spinning Clinton's comments, and whitewashing - if you'll forgive the unintentional pun - Obama's own campaign behavior.

What, exactly, is reasonable about your position?

[ Parent ]

Because I'm tired of going around in circles by lm (2.00 / 0) #16 Tue May 13, 2008 at 11:38:19 AM EST
``I've presented you with two appeals ''

Right, and I've responded as to why I see a difference between the appeals are being made. You don't see those differences. That's fine. I'm not attacking you for not seeing the same thing I do.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

it is by MillMan (2.00 / 0) #10 Tue May 13, 2008 at 02:09:38 AM EST
just a symbol of Clinton's desperation. Her campaign is running on fumes.

That ad is race baiting, sure, but nationally Obama has had to kiss a lot of white ass, especially in the wake of "pastor gate." With most of the country being white and the default voting style being "from the gut" he doesn't have much choice.

When I'm imprisoned as an enemy combatant, will you blog about it?
[ Parent ]

I agree that Clinton's running on fumes. by Billy Goat (2.00 / 0) #12 Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:38:01 AM EST
Her persistence is bizarre. I've heard no good theories to explain her continued efforts.

I disagree, though, that this is new phase for Obama. He was promising Dems to bring in the black vote as early as January of this year, well before having explain the irrelevant rantings of Wright to the scandal hungry media.

I'm just trying to point to what I feel is a double standard. When Clinton calls a group of female voters the backbone of her campaign (and they are, women have strongly supported her campaign throughout), she's playing slimy identity politics. When Obama overtly appeals to the race of black voters, he's "got no choice."

I don't see the difference.

[ Parent ]

double standards by MillMan (2.00 / 0) #17 Tue May 13, 2008 at 01:42:23 PM EST
I think Hilary has had a slightly easier go-round with the media during this campaign. But not by much. I won't offer evidence though. They've both been slapped around a lot.

When I'm imprisoned as an enemy combatant, will you blog about it?
[ Parent ]

I saw some data from the Pew Center . . . by Billy Goat (2.00 / 0) #18 Tue May 13, 2008 at 02:46:19 PM EST
Clinton got more coverage in total, but a slightly higher percentage of the coverage was negative. But we're talking just a couple of percentage points of difference.

Curiously, when asked during the same period, Americans of both political persuasions thought they noticed Obama got overwhelmingly more press, a vast majority of it positive. I don't know what to make of that. Suggests an interesting split between what the media coverage & spin and the public opinion it supposedly shapes.

[ Parent ]

People tend to notice things that are new by lm (2.00 / 0) #19 Wed May 14, 2008 at 05:14:21 PM EST
Obama is newer to the political scene, hence people notice him more than they do Clinton whose been in the national news in one form or another for 16+ years.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Cooking with cola by Merekat (2.00 / 0) #11 Tue May 13, 2008 at 04:07:22 AM EST
I hear it makes a tasty ham glaze, but I would not have thought of using it with beef. I think it might be an interesting chicken marinade too. These guys might be going a bit far though.



One thing about coca-cola by lm (2.00 / 0) #13 Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:06:23 AM EST
It does a very nice job of tenderizing meat. If you've got a tough cut, soak it in coke for a couple hours before cooking. It'll come out tender.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Monday morning news round up and the life and times of lm over the weekend | 19 comments (19 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback